jorts.horse costs $50 per month, and we're *really not that large*. and we're *lagging*. that's kind of concerning.
i don't have a solution, but, there it is.
@killeveryhetero i would say that patreon has helped snouts.online a LOT with this but you're right - there's going to come a point at which personal and small instance ownership and maintenance will be a luxury afforded to only those with the money or infrastructure control to keep it up
@mythismathic yeah, jorts.horse is also mostly crowdfunded. we were 100% crowdfunded before, but we lost a large-ish pledge at some point -- i havent resolicited the rest of the funds because i'm holding off until i get my shit together and restore our customizations from when i broke my github, and i can cover it anyway
$50/month is a *lot* of money, the server hardware we're on was always supposed to be overkill
i want to just put the messaging out there since i've seen this pattern happen so many times before, going back to the 90s even:
social network loads scale exponentially. not even multiplicatively - exponentially.
the more networks there are and the more users and posts to serve up to each one, the more each one requires more resources for every individual post it pulls;
you see the problem, don't you? plurality will hit a saturation point unless we wildly expand our tech infrastructure and control over it to match.
we're dealing with the problems of success. let's try to outmaneuver them.
cc @killeveryhetero for excellent discussion of the subject!
@killeveryhetero the only thing i dont know is like, im not sure this is the fediverse either? like witches is pretty busy and all but it mostly hums along, and while sometimes there's just huge spikes of shit idk that's pretty much always either some big instance going down or in this case remember wasabi went down. again. which fucks up a lot of things
it does seem like there's SOMETHING fucky with your server, which i can neither confirm nor deny is a curse
@killeveryhetero maybe Mastodon isn't decentralized enough. Right now it's only decentralized at the server level...
What if everytime I browsing their instance did some of the servers work for it in the background?
Instances would then get stronger as more people used it, like a torrent does
@tootbrute every instance stores all of the content of every other instance it communicates with
when you look at my post from your instance... you're being served the content from your instance
this means that even storage is being duplicated across the fediverse exponentially, which is also a longterm concern
@killeveryhetero yes that's good to avoid censorship but bad for efficiency
Does not seem the fediverse in its current firm could scale to 10 million users
@tootbrute well, mastodon can't
pleroma possibly could, it's way more resource efficient at the cost of features
@killeveryhetero I get backlogs sometimes and I only have a 11 person instance. Scaling is hard and there are some issues in github for scaling/performance problems. Mastodon got out on the right foot by implementing redis and elastic cache from the start. That plus the docker containers makes it easy for people to get started. Low barriers to entry + future scaling are difficult problems/concerns. I'm interesting if we'll see JVM (Kotlin/Scala/Java) activitypub implementations in the future.
Unstoppable shitposting engine.